Python Get Files in a Folder: A Complete Guide
When you start working with file systems in Python, one of the most common tasks is to retrieve all files stored inside a specific directory. Even so, whether you are building a data‑processing pipeline, creating a backup utility, or simply need to list assets for a web application, knowing how to python get files in a folder efficiently is essential. This article walks you through the most popular approaches, explains the underlying mechanisms, and answers frequent questions so you can choose the right method for your project.
Introduction
The ability to list files programmatically is a cornerstone of automation in Python. Each method will be broken down into clear steps, and we will discuss when to prefer one over the other. In this guide we will explore three primary techniques: using the classic os module, leveraging the modern pathlib API, and employing glob for pattern‑based selection. The phrase python get files in a folder appears in countless tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, and documentation pages because developers constantly need to discover what resides in a directory before they can read, copy, move, or delete it. By the end of this article you will have a solid understanding of how to retrieve file names, filter them, and handle edge cases such as hidden files, subdirectories, and permission errors That alone is useful..
Easier said than done, but still worth knowing.
Steps to Retrieve Files
Below are the step‑by‑step procedures for each approach. Follow the numbered list to see how you can implement the technique in just a few lines of code.
1. Using os.listdir() and os.path
Step 1 – Import the required modules
import os
Step 2 – Define the folder path
folder_path = r"C:\Users\YourName\Documents" # Windows example
# or
folder_path = "/home/yourname/documents" # Unix/Linux/macOS example
Step 3 – List all entries in the directory
entries = os.listdir(folder_path)
os.listdir() returns a list of strings, each representing a file or subdirectory inside folder_path. It does not differentiate between files and folders automatically And it works..
Step 4 – Separate files from directories (optional)
files = []
dirs = []
for entry in entries:
full_path = os.path.join(folder_path, entry)
if os.path.isfile(full_path):
files.append(entry)
else:
dirs.append(entry)
Now files contains only the regular files, while dirs holds subdirectories.
Step 5 – Filter by extension or pattern (optional)
# Example: keep only .txt files
txt_files = [f for f in files if f.lower().endswith('.txt')]
Why use this method?
- It is the most straightforward and works in all Python versions.
- It provides full control because you decide how to treat each entry.
Potential pitfalls
- Symbolic links are reported as files unless you add extra checks.
- Permission errors (
PermissionError) may be raised; wrap the call in a try‑except block if needed.
2. Leveraging pathlib.Path.iterdir()
Step 1 – Import Path
from pathlib import Path
Step 2 – Create a Path object for the folder
folder = Path(r"C:\Users\YourName\Documents") # or Path("/home/yourname/documents")
Step 3 – Iterate over items
files = []
for item in folder.iterdir():
if item.is_file():
files.append(item.name) # or item for the full Path object
Path.iterdir() yields Path objects, making it easy to call methods like is_file(), is_dir(), or suffix.
Step 4 – Apply filters
# Keep only .py files
py_files = [p.name for p in folder.iterdir() if p.is_file() and p.suffix.lower() == '.py']
Why choose pathlib?
- The API feels more object‑oriented and is generally more readable.
- It handles cross‑platform path separators automatically.
- It integrates nicely with other pathlib methods such as
glob()andmatch().
Edge cases
- If the folder does not exist,
folder.iterdir()raises aFileNotFoundError. - Hidden files (those starting with a dot on Unix) are included unless you explicitly filter them out.
3. Using glob.glob() for Pattern Matching
Step 1 – Import glob
import glob
Step 2 – Define the pattern
# Retrieve all files (no recursion)
all_files = glob.glob(r"C:\Users\YourName\Documents\*")
# Retrieve files with a specific extension
txt_files = glob.glob(r"C:\Users\YourName\Documents\*.txt")
# Retrieve files in subdirectories (recursive)
recursive_files = glob.glob(r"C:\Users\YourName\Documents\**\*", recursive=True)
glob uses shell‑style wildcards. The asterisk * matches any character sequence, while ? matches a single character Most people skip this — try not to..
Step 3 – Convert to Path objects (optional)
from pathlib import Path
path_objects = [Path(p) for p in txt_files]
Why use glob?
- It is perfect when you need to match file names based on patterns (e.g.,
*.csv). - The syntax is concise and familiar to users with a background in command‑line tools.
Limitations
globdoes not differentiate between files and directories by default; you must add extra checks.- It does not handle hidden files on Unix unless you explicitly include a leading dot in the pattern (e.g.,
.*).
Scientific Explanation
Understanding how each method works under the hood helps you diagnose performance issues and choose the most appropriate tool That's the whole idea..
OS Module Internals
os.To determine if an entry is a file, Python uses os.Now, because it operates at a low level, it is fast but provides minimal metadata. It reads the directory entry names as raw strings, which are then returned as a Python list. path.Also, listdir()ultimately calls the C library functionopendir()andreaddir() on the target directory. isfile(), which internally invokes stat() system call to examine the file mode bits That alone is useful..
Pathlib Implementation
pathlib is a pure‑Python wrapper built on top of os and os.On the flip side, path. Path.iterdir() delegates to os.Consider this: listdir() and then constructs Path objects for each name. The is_file() method again uses stat() but caches the result in a small internal dictionary to avoid repeated system calls when the same path is queried multiple times Easy to understand, harder to ignore..
Glob Mechanics
glob.glob() uses the POSIX pattern matching algorithm. It first expands the pattern to a
Here's a thinking process:
- Analyze User Input:
- User wants me to "Continue the article naturally."
- "Do not repeat previous text."
- "Finish with a proper conclusion."
- The provided text ends with:
It first expands the pattern to a
- Identify the Issue:
- The text cuts off abruptly at
It first expands the pattern to a - I need to continue from there, easily, without repeating what's already there.
- I need to finish with a proper conclusion.
- Determine the Content to Continue:
- The section is "Glob Mechanics" under "Scientific Explanation"
- It's discussing how
glob.glob()works under the hood - The sentence starts with "It first expands the pattern to a" - likely "a list of paths" or "matching entries"
- I should complete the thought about glob mechanics, then transition to the other methods or wrap up with a conclusion.
Let me think about what makes sense:
glob.glob()expands the pattern to matching file system entries- It uses
fnmatchor similar pattern matching - It returns strings, not Path objects (unless converted)
- It can be limited by recursion, etc.
Then I need a conclusion that ties everything together.
- Drafting - Section by Section (mental):
Continuing the cut-off sentence: "It first expands the pattern to a list of matching file system entries, which are then filtered and returned as strings."
Then I can discuss the internals a bit more, or transition to comparing the methods, then conclude.
Actually, looking at the structure:
- "Scientific Explanation" heading
- "OS Module Internals"
- "Pathlib Implementation"
- "Glob Mechanics" (currently cut off)
- Then presumably a conclusion, but the user said "Finish with a proper conclusion." So maybe the conclusion should come after I finish the glob mechanics section.
Let me draft the continuation of "Glob Mechanics":
Glob Mechanics
glob.Think about it: glob() uses the POSIX pattern matching algorithm. It first expands the pattern to a list of matching file system entries, which are then filtered for existence and type. Plus, the implementation relies on the fnmatch module for pattern matching against raw strings, and it interacts with the os. listdir() or equivalent directory scanning functions to resolve actual paths. Special characters in filenames may require escaping, and the function returns relative or absolute paths depending on the input pattern.
The official docs gloss over this. That's a mistake.
Why use glob?
- ...
Wait, the user said "Do not repeat previous text.And " or "Limitations" sections unless I'm adding new content. But the article structure already has those. " So I shouldn't repeat the "Why use glob?I need to continue naturally from where it left off, likely completing the "Glob Mechanics" paragraph, then perhaps a conclusion that summarizes the three methods.
Let me re-read the user's prompt: "Continue the article naturally. Do not repeat previous text. Finish with a proper conclusion.
The previous text ends with: It first expands the pattern to a
I need to finish that sentence and the section, then add a conclusion.
Let me write the continuation:
"It first expands the pattern to a list of matching file system entries, which are then returned as strings. Think about it: glob()invokesos. The algorithm follows POSIX shell-style wildcard rules, where * matches everything, ?Internally, glob.fnmatch()to each name against the provided pattern. matches a single character, and [seq] matches any character in the set. Because of that, scandir()to enumerate directory contents, then appliesfnmatch. listdir()oros.Results are not sorted by default, and the function does not guarantee any specific order, though many implementations return results in the order the OS provides them It's one of those things that adds up. That's the whole idea..
You'll probably want to bookmark this section Worth keeping that in mind..
Then I need a conclusion. Which means the conclusion should tie together os. listdir(), pathlib, and glob.glob(), highlighting when to use each, their trade-offs, and performance considerations.
Let me draft the conclusion:
"To keep it short, choosing the right directory traversal method depends on the specific requirements of your task. Worth adding: os. Practically speaking, listdir() offers raw speed and minimal overhead when you only need names and will handle metadata checks separately. pathlib provides an object-oriented, readable interface with built-in methods like is_file() and iterdir(), making it ideal for modern Python code that needs both iteration and file type verification. glob.glob() excels when pattern matching is the primary goal, such as selecting files by extension or naming convention, though it comes with the trade-off of returning strings and requiring additional steps to distinguish files from directories. By understanding the internals of each—system calls for os, wrapper logic for pathlib, and pattern expansion for glob—you can write more efficient, maintainable, and bug-free code.
That looks good. I'll make sure the transition is seamless, no repetition of the exact previous text, and it flows logically.
Let me piece it together properly. I'll start right after the cut-off point And that's really what it comes down to..
Full continuation:
"It first expands the pattern to a list of matching file system entries, which are then returned as strings. scandir()to enumerate directory contents, then appliesfnmatch.The algorithm follows POSIX shell-style wildcard rules, where * matches everything, ?Worth adding: glob() invokes os. matches a single character, and [seq] matches any character in the set. But listdir()oros. That's why internally, glob. fnmatch() to each name against the provided pattern.
Results are not sorted by default, and the function does not guarantee any specific order, though many implementations return results in the order the OS provides them Turns out it matters..
This design philosophy—prioritizing speed over presentation—makes glob particularly well-suited for scripting and automation tasks where the caller intends to process files in a loop anyway. On the flip side, if sorted output matters, developers must explicitly call sorted() on the returned list, adding a small but sometimes necessary overhead.
Another important distinction lies in how each method handles recursive traversal. In practice, while os. walk() remains the traditional approach for walking directory trees, both pathlib and glob have embraced recursion in their own ways. That's why pathlib. Here's the thing — path. rglob() and pathlib.And path. glob() with the ** pattern allow concise, readable recursive searches. Think about it: similarly, glob. Plus, glob() supports a recursive=True parameter that enables ** to match any number of directory levels. Under the hood, these recursive variants still rely on the same fundamental system calls but add the complexity of tree descent.
When performance is a critical concern, benchmarks consistently show that os.scandir() outperforms os.That's why listdir() because it caches file type information from the directory entry, avoiding extra stat() calls. pathlib builds on top of os.scandir(), so it inherits much of that efficiency while adding the convenience of path objects. Day to day, glob. glob(), being a higher-level abstraction, tends to be the slowest of the three for large directories because of the additional pattern-matching layer applied to every entry It's one of those things that adds up. And it works..
The bottom line: the best choice depends on context. For quick, pattern-based file discovery, glob is hard to beat. Also, for modern, object-oriented codebases that benefit from method chaining and rich path manipulation, pathlib is the natural fit. And when every microsecond counts in a tight loop over thousands of entries, dropping down to os.scandir() gives you the most direct control over system resources. Together, these three tools cover virtually every directory traversal scenario Python developers encounter, and understanding their internals empowers you to select the right tool with confidence.